Search for: "Smith v. Employment Division"
Results 101 - 120
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 4:05 am
David Kearney, an attorney with the firm, agreed to represent Smith in the Federal action and subsequently agreed to represent Smith in the §3020-a proceeding.** SCI reported that it had substantiated Kearney's allegations regarding Smith’s threats and recommended that Smith's employment be terminated and that he be placed on the Department’s “ineligible employment list. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:51 pm
While we do not often, if ever, blog about decisions in the area of employment law, the Supreme Court of New Jersey earlier this week in the decision of Smith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm
Consumer Protection Division v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we do not find his case to be one of "the rarest of cases" in which an exception to the general rule applies (Matter of Taranto v City of Glen Cove, 212 AD3d at 828 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1211). [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we do not find his case to be one of "the rarest of cases" in which an exception to the general rule applies (Matter of Taranto v City of Glen Cove, 212 AD3d at 828 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1211). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” No, according to the Court of Appeal's ruling in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
As its name suggests, RFRA was designed to “restore” the law of religious free exercise to the legal principles and precedents that the Court had established prior to its heavily criticized decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:33 am
The court instead invoked Lambert v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Here is the abstract: This essay was part of a Cardozo symposium celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the landmark free exercise case, Employment Division v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Avishalom Westreich, Assisted Reproduction in Israel: Law, Religion, and Culture, (Brill Research Perspectives: Family law in a Global Society, 2018).Steven Douglas Smith, The Case of the Exemption Claimants: Religion, Conscience, and Identity, (San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 18-345, 2018).Sidney Martin, Oklahoma's 'Bone-Dry' Law and the Fallacy of Legislative Accommodation Under Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
In the recent unreported decision of Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 am
To start, as announced in Employment Division v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
Verner (1963) and Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:20 am
New York State Appellate Division, 3rd Department: Detraglia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:42 pm
Indeed, Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
A better case might be made for overruling existing precedents, most notably Employment Division v. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
An Extra Division of the Inner House (Lord MacKay of Drumadoon, Lady Dorrian and Lord McEwan) reversed the decision of Lady Smith (Doogan v Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board [2013] CSIH 36 2013 SC 496, 2013 SLT 517). [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
11/6/1989: Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am
Relying on 30-year precedent set forth in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
