Search for: "Smith v. Gaines"
Results 101 - 120
of 804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:15 pm
David Smith: My name is David Smith. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:15 am
Here’s an excerpt from the judge’s opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am
The alleged “lost opportunity” damages are too speculative to support a recovery, since a plaintiff cannot be compensated under a fraud cause of action “for what [he] might have gained” (Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d 137, 142 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am
The alleged “lost opportunity” damages are too speculative to support a recovery, since a plaintiff cannot be compensated under a fraud cause of action “for what [he] might have gained” (Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d 137, 142 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
Sineneng-Smith and Seila v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
What does she have to gain? [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 11:00 am
LEXIS 92536 (ED CA, Dec. 21, 2006), a California federal district court held that a Buddhist prisoner had not exhausted his administrative remedies before he filed suit challenging the difficulties he experienced in attempting to gain access to a vegetarian diet in prison.In the one recent case on another topic, in Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:20 am
Butterworth v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:00 am
Arconti v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:34 pm
The government's argument rests on a 34-year-old Supreme Court case, Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:07 am
The matter came before Mr Justice Peter Smith who had to decide, as a preliminary issue, whether the Fund was allowed to do so. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:02 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am
This was based on the Australian case of of Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Aust) Limited v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 22 FCR 73. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
A judgement of the Upper Tribunal of the UK Information Rights Tribunal (the Tribunal), in the case of Central London Community Healthcare Trust v Information Commissioner [2013] UKUT 0551 (AAC), has ruled that organisations which voluntarily report incidents of data security breaches to the ICO do not gain automatic immunity from penalty fines in relation to that breach. [read post]
