Search for: "Smith v. Howard" Results 101 - 120 of 371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
These developments apparently have not yet affected a third case raising similar issues, but reaching the Court from a Texas state court, not the Fifth Circuit; that case, Smith v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s preview came from Howard Wasserman; Isaac Syed previews the case for Cornell. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:28 am by Russ Bensing
  A federal bankruptcy court had given Smith $89 million, but last week in Stern v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am by Rick Garnett
Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard Gillman
Howard Gillman is the chancellor and a professor of political science and law at University of California, Irvine. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am by Conor McEvily
  (Thanks again to Howard Bashman for the link.) [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm by Stephen Wermiel
  In terms of potential impact, the case of Sorrell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Shea Denning
Vt. 2013), aff’d, 831 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2016) (stating that “the instant case is distinguishable from Smith [v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:12 am
I believe the law was correctly summarized by Smith, J. in Stav v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At Tucson.com, Howard Fischer discusses Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:30 am by Allison Brownell Tirres
Allison Brownell Tirres Advocates of equality breathed a sigh of relief when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bostock v. [read post]