Search for: "Smith v. Powers"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 1:09 pm
Our high level discussion was on the following: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
SCOTUS Dubs PTAB/APJ Structure a ‘Rare Bird’, Pushes for Workable Remedies in Arthrex Oral Arguments
1 Mar 2021, 12:17 pm
Supreme Court today heard arguments in United States/ Smith & Nephew v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:58 pm
(Select) Michael V. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Smith (1820). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
In today’s argument in Golan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:55 pm
Therefore, in Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:01 am
The only way this Court can ensure observance of Congress’s abridgement of their habeas power is to perform the unaccustomed task of reviewing utterly fact-bound decisions that present no disputed issues of law. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:58 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court decided the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm
In Stern v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
The SG had previously sought more time to respond to a cert petition arising from a Coast Guard case – Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In Itochu Corporation v Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH [2012] EWCA Civ 996 the Court of Appeal refused to grant permission to appeal an order granted by Mr Justice Andrew Smith that a sole arbitrator be appointed in an arbitration between the applicants, Itochu Corporation (Itochu) and the respondents, Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH (Johann).Before Andrew Smith J, Johann had argued that, in the absence of an agreement between the parties, the default position set out in section… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:30 pm
In Schoon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
In essence, the question for Stuart-Smith J was whether that change was an abuse of power. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
In essence, the question for Stuart-Smith J was whether that change was an abuse of power. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm
We may be beginning to see the fallout from Stern v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
In response, Smith & Nephew rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm
Black Box: Powerful Eye Witness in Car Accident Cases I’m Ed Smith, a Car Accident Attorney in Sacramento. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Per Blackburn-Smith v Lambeth London Borough Council [2007] EWHC 767 (Admin) and Dobbs J:” the defendant’s powers were never intended to enable it to act as an alternative welfare agency in circumstances where Parliament had determined that the claimant should be excluded from mainstream benefits;…”The High Court agreed with Barking.Section 17 (1) gives a clear indication of the purposes for which the powers in that part of the… [read post]
