Search for: "Smith v. Social Security Administration"
Results 101 - 120
of 265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
The Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” reviews appeals from administrative decisions by individuals seeking disability benefits. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
That the plaintiff, by reason of age, infirmity, or otherwise, is now or may be entitled in the future to receive any compensation or benefits by reason of the Social Security Law of the United States or from any governmental agency such as the veterans' Administration, Medicare, or sources of this nature.5. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Smith LJ went further. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
Also on 5 December 2024, judgment was handed down by Linden J dismissing the appeal Smith v Poulton & Ors [2024] EWHC 3115 (KB). [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
The first arose in 1995, when his health began to deteriorate and he applied to the Social Security Administration (SSA) for long-term disability benefits. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The Commission consists of nine Senators, nine Members of the House of Representatives, and five senior Administration officials appointed by the President. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am
In December, Smith asked for 21 days between the Court granting cert and oral argument (per the U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Plaintiffs Brian Hall, Lewis Randall and Norman Rogers allege that HHS and the Social Security Administration told them they would lose the thousands of dollars they had paid into Social Security over the years if they did not enroll in the federal health care. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Judge Smith’s decision correctly relied upon the Supreme Court’s First Amendment decisions in Bowen v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Smith, 1987 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1987] 2 SCR 99, and adopted and applied by the Supreme Court in Lac Minerals Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Property rights and control of social groupings. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 7:06 am
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:55 am
Identified AAPD's political priorities for: Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI); Supplemental Security Income (SSI); Medicaid; and Medicare. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Koorsen Fire & Security, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Department of Children And Families ,(Fla.App. 4 Dist.)Government - Agency was not required to pay any fees for establishment of special needs pooled trust for developmentally disabled teenager.In a matter of first impression, the District Court of Appeal of Florida has held that the Department of Children and Families, as trustee of a master trust into which a developmentally disabled teenager's Social Security disability benefits were paid, was not required to pay any… [read post]
