Search for: "Smith v. Wells"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,384
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
The question that the court agreed on Friday to decide in Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
He held that on the balance of probabilities, Roberts-Smith kicked a handcuffed prisoner off a cliff in Darwan in 2012 before ordering a subordinate Australian soldier to shoot the injured man dead and that in 2009, Roberts-Smith ordered the killing of an elderly man found hiding in a tunnel in a bombed-out compound codenamed “Whiskey 108”, as well as murdering a disabled man with a prosthetic leg during the same mission, using a para machine gun. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
” But he rightly warned that whether Trump wins in court, “Today’s legal argument could very well be next year’s exercise of presidential power. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
-EV] I'm especially interested in pieces that work well with newcomers to the debates. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
On Jan. 10, the justices will hear Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
Here is the complaint: Babbitt v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm
I also think the Jack Smith prosecution of Trump is unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:41 am
Arizona and the SG, and some of the other supporting amici as well, raise once more the supposed multi-witness problem – i.e., the idea that if the Confrontation Clause is deemed to require that an analyst in the position of Rast testify subject to confrontation then there will often have to be a parade of lab witnesses. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Smith (Marva) v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
July 19, 2007) (concluding that the "defendants' description of [the plaintiff] as a racist" was, as a matter of law, "an opinion and thus is not actionable"); Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm
I’m hoping to write more in a few days on the Arizona and SG briefs in Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:47 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
And on Jan. 10, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
