Search for: "Smith v. White et al"
Results 101 - 112
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
"Graham v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
SMITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097 - ADEASee issue description at Public Citizeno SCOTUS docket hereLewis, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
We affirm.In Chanelle Linet Alexander, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
Trouble is… I just have a feeling The Home Office will forget to specify the ‘dress code’ and provide a guest list and we’ll have reports in the The Sun / The Mirror et al that Jacqui Smith was refused entry to her own office. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
The case, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
Missions' Employees Is Affirmed The Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations et al., petitioners v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
App. 1993); White v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Patent No. 5,063,811 to Smith et al. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Solomon introduced a bill that eventually became the Solomon Amendment [8], mandating, in part, that military recruiters not be denied access to campuses lest the entire university be cut off from funding derived from the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, et al. [9],[10]. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Waxman et. al., Amicus Brief in Smith v. [read post]
