Search for: "Snowden v. Snowden" Results 101 - 120 of 636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 18 July 2019 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of ARN v OSD. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, promises not to speak are legally binding (see Cohen v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:40 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
ProtonMail further claims that it is exempt from the Swiss Federal Act on the Surveillance of Post and Telecommunications (SPTA, German: Bundesgesetz betreffend die Überwachung des Post- und Fernmeldeverkehrs, BÜPF) and the Ordinance on the Surveillance of Post and Telecommunications (SPTO, German: Verordnung über die Überwachung des Post- und Fernmeldeverkehrs, VÜPF). [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Snowden Marshall cited for contempt because he used insulting language in a letter to Congress. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Justin Hemmings, Nathan Swire
As revealed by the Edward Snowden leaks in 2013, the U.S. has engaged in wide-scale espionage, including on international organizations such as the World Bank, and companies in friendly countries such as Brazil and Germany. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Jackie McDermott
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 8:16 am by Sean Gallagher
The most controversial National Security Agency surveillance program, originally exposed by documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, has apparently ended quietly, according to the National Security Advisor to Republican House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183 v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, in the event there is conflicting evidence, the Appellate Division said it must defer to the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations.Finding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support finding Petitioner guilty of the charges served upon him pursuant to §75 alleging that he had committed acts of misconduct that constituted crimes," the Appellate Division sustained the appointing authority's decision to impose the penalty of… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, in the event there is conflicting evidence, the Appellate Division said it must defer to the Hearing Officer's credibility determinations.Finding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support finding Petitioner guilty of the charges served upon him pursuant to §75 alleging that he had committed acts of misconduct that constituted crimes," the Appellate Division sustained the appointing authority's decision to impose the penalty of… [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:30 pm by Charlie Dunlap
Nevertheless, she readily participated in judging the Trump v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:59 pm by Stewart Baker
Nate Jones and I examine the latest chapters in the now-encyclopedic tale of Silicon Valley v. [read post]