Search for: "Southern v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 8,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 7:16 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Weinstein for tipping me off to another hot-off-the-presses decision addressing class arbitration waivers following AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In 2010, Judge Brookman received the Director’s Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder, in Washington, DC, for superior performance as an Assistant United States Attorney, for his work on the United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:05 am by Dan Ernst
Sallee Black Southerners' Suits Against their Former Masters: Cases and Teaching ResourcesRethinking the Role of State Courts in the Lives of Black Southerners: What I've Learned [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Met Life, where the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York agreed that determining the nature and extent of MetLife's structural conflict of interest warranted significant discovery, particularly in light of the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 4:46 am by John L. Welch
Creative Arts by Calloway, LLC has filed a complaint (here) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking review under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 2:53 am
Posted in College Football, Football, Men of Troy, PAC-10, Sports, Trojans, University of Southern California, USC, USC Football, USC Logo       [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am by Dennis Boyle
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am by Dennis Boyle
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 8:48 am
In rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument that reliance need not be shown to certify a class under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Southern District not only distinguished a seemingly contrary Florida state court decision, but explicitly stated that the court is not bound by that decision.In Pop’s Pancakes, Inc. v. [read post]