Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Nevertheless, applying Munjaz [2005] UKHL 58 “cogent reasons … spelled out clearly, logically and convincingly” were needed to depart from statutory guidance. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:24 am
Booker is not a magical incantation which spells the disappearance of congressional enacted mandatories (yet).US v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
Grits is headed to the capitol this morning for an event celebrating the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
It was a facial challenge that failed in state courts. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:16 pm
A white 1999 Ford F350 pickup driven by David V. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:29 am
Alteration of spelling in 16c. is unexplained. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm
In Snead v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
Even if the analysis is right and the Secretary of State was not obliged to set out where things had got to, there would have been nothing to stop him spelling this out. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:56 pm
In Adkins v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:30 am
The biological mother attempted to verify this status, but spelled the father’s name wrong and misrepresented his birthday in the request, so the Nation could not locate the father’s registration. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:22 am
The theory that brought about this result became an instant icon, of sorts, with the defense bar, and was even noted by Justice Scalia years later in the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
One was whether the Court had jurisdiction to review a collateral state court’s decision not to apply Miller v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:04 pm
The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
In a seminal decision that may spell the end of murder indictments as the weapon of choice for drunk drivers, the Appellate Division, Second Department, with one justice dissenting, reversed and dismissed a first degree assault conviction in People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm
But it’s not clear that Ecuador, rather than the US, is the outlier here: in InvestorsHub.com v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
His play King Henry V is a sustained and powerful meditation on the interrelationships of all three. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 5:17 am
New v. [read post]
