Search for: "Spiegel v Spiegel"
Results 101 - 120
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 3:25 am
In Leder v Spiegel(31 AD3d 246,267 [ 1” Dept 2006 the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that “[in order to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the complaint must set forth three elements: the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm
Arthur Spiegel***Ivonne Cuesta v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Spiegel missed out with 26% of the vote.In the General Election, in November of 2000, (can you say Bush v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Rev. 270-320 (2011).ALTERNATIVE FUELS.Feld, Danielle Spiegel. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
Arthur Spiegel signed the Opinion and Order on March 10, 2011 but it wasn’t available until March 15 2011.) [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:20 am
The first case (Axel Springer v Germany (App No 39954/08)) concerned media reports about a famous German TV personality who had been arrested for allegedly having used cocaine. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:20 am
The second case, Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) (App Nos. 40660/08 ; 60641/08) concerned the publication of Prince Caroline of Monaco and her husband in “Frau im Spiegel. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:02 am
The second case, Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) (App Nos. 40660/08 ; 60641/08) concerned the publication of Prince Caroline of Monaco and her husband in “Frau im Spiegel.” It showed the couple taking a walk during their skiing holiday in St. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:58 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has announced today that it will deliver two Grand Chamber judgments, in the cases of Axel Springer AG v Germanyand von Hannover v Germany (No.2) on 7 February 2012. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:41 am
The European Court of Human Rights has announced today that it will deliver two Grand Chamber judgments, in the cases of Axel Springer AG v Germany and von Hannover v Germany (No.2) on 7 February 2012. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
Finally, construing the pleading in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as is required on consideration of [*4]a CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss, we find that it asserts actions and omissions by defendants that support viable claims for recovery (see Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
In its ruling in Kusnierz, the Court of Appeal stated that it preferred Spiegel’s conclusion and reasons in Desbiens to those of the trial judge in Kusnierz. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am
These allegations met the requirements of a legal malpractice claim inasmuch as they set forth " the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages'" (see O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581, 582 [2011], quoting Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]). [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am
The ability for such an agreement to be concluded has been disputed in the last couple of hours, with Der Spiegel reporting the following: EU officials in Brussels say, because monetary union is regulated extensively in the Lisbon Treaty, reform can only be implemented within the existing legal framework. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied); see also Spiegel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied); see also Spiegel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:30 am
But just see the ICSID press release on the live stream of the Public Hearing started today in the matter Railroad Development Corporation v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am
Accordingly, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint adequately pleaded the element regarding the defendants' failure to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d at 837). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:59 am
Accordingly, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint adequately pleaded the element regarding the defendants' failure to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d at 837). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Plaintiff put forth sufficient detail to establish the negligence of the attorneys, that the negligence was the proximate cause of the losses sustained by the benefits funds, and actual damages to those funds (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581, 582 [2011]). [read post]
