Search for: "Spring v. Arizona, State of"
Results 101 - 120
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
I think it would require this “state-specific v. general competence” question to be addressed. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
The state came to the Supreme Court in the spring, asking the justices to summarily – that is, without additional briefing or oral argument – reverse the 9th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:45 pm
Cafasso v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 5:12 am
Arizona and Richardson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm
The new cases will probably be slated for argument in late winter or early spring. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Arizona, 15-8366, on its third relist, and Johnson v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:37 am
" The standard under Franks v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Setser v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:41 pm
First, Arizona Cattle Growers’ Ass’n v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:30 am
This spring, the State Bar of Arizona fielded a team in the P.F. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:13 pm
District Court for the District of Arizona (Phoenix Division) against Eisai, Inc. and Eisai Medical Research, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
