Search for: "Stanford v. Texas" Results 101 - 120 of 454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
Suit Over BP's Dividend Cancellation After Deepwater Disaster Is Dismissed, Bloomberg/BNA, July 9, 2012 Glenn v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Burke, Masterpiece Cakeshop and Authentic Pluralism in a Post-Obergefell World, 24 Texas Review of Law & Policy 97-134 (2019). [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
Kobylarz discusses Mark Lemley's change in position on obviousness in KSR v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:37 am by Marissa Miller
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Stanford law professor Jeffrey Fisher discusses the upcoming oral argument in Williams v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court case, Relentless Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
”  In the Stanford Daily, Hiroko Sunamura reports on the university’s response to the Court’s holding in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am by Alexander Ross Perry, Christopher Meyer
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
Project Veritas v Leland Stanford Junior University, 2022 WL 1555047 (W.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
And the Supreme Court’s decision (by granting cert to Fisher v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:48 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
The Special Supreme Court of Texas handed down its lone opinion in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Keyssar observes of the failure of the proportionalist Lodge-Gossett reform of 1950 (led by the liberal Republican senator Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts and the Texas segregationist representative Ed Lee Gossett): “an institutional reform that, in itself, had long been regarded as democratic, might well have anti-democratic consequences in a nation containing a large region that lacked universal suffrage” (164). [read post]