Search for: "State, Dept. of Public Safety v. Held" Results 101 - 120 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The court also held that the district court correctly concluded that the takings test articulated in Nollan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Big Tent Democrat
Nor, in view of the methods employed to stamp out the disease of smallpox, can anyone confidently assert that the means prescribed by the state to that end has no real or substantial relation to the protection of the public health and the public safety. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:31 am
The legitimate interest of the public agency or private employer in protecting property, and the safety and welfare of specific individuals or the general public. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
 Thus, although [Lohr] can be read to allow certain state-law causes of actions that parallel federal safety requirements, it does not and cannot stand for the proposition that any violation of the FDCA will support a state-law claim. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Nate Nieman
The answer to that question, some may argue, is found in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp., 52 AD3d 710 (2d Dept 2008), involve outside creditors not affiliated with the corporation. [read post]