Search for: "State ex rel. Doe v. Register"
Results 101 - 120
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
(I note a trend of courts finding that suggestive marks are relatively weak.) [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:46 pm
In United States ex rel Hobbs v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
” (People ex rel. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:55 am
In one of its first decisions today, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) upheld an Examiner's 35 U.S.C. 103 obviousness rejection, citing, as it often does, the KSR v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:41 am
See also, State ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
The application was rejected pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of the CTM Regulation and the examiner stated that Maharishi had failed to prove that the sign had acquired distinctive character through use in Belgium and France, ex Article 7(3). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 1:51 am
Concluding the argument, the patent agents state “Therefore we submit that the vehicle/product of this invention does not fall within the scope of Section 5(a) of the Patent Act.” [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Section 498-A was added with a view to punishing a husband and his relatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
Tabari does seem to suggest that. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
Beck v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
The answer seems to be relatively straightforward. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
Hanford Sentinel Ex-Employees Awarded $4,000 for Email Snooping by Employer -- Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 3:23 pm
" Phase one begins with Bush v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Thus the benefit gained from TM feels thin relative to the costs of granting TM protection over things that could threaten patent values. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
Big issues: ex ante v. ex post examination; property v. liability rules; what do we want to protect, exactly; also how the design patent system relates to product design trade dress protection. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
Also, the defense is personal and does not extend to related entities and other locations. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:40 am
Somewhat interesting was State ex rel. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
Fourth Department States That Federal Poverty Income Guidelines Do Not Apply Where Income Is Imputed in Excess of Guidelines Amount In Niagra County Department of Social Services ex rel Hueber v Hueber, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433691 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) the Support Magistrate imputed income to Respondent based on the minimum wage for a period of over three years and ordered that he pay child support arrears for that period of $1,870.68. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
Fourth Department States That Federal Poverty Income Guidelines Do Not Apply Where Income Is Imputed in Excess of Guidelines Amount In Niagra County Department of Social Services ex rel Hueber v Hueber, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433691 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) the Support Magistrate imputed income to Respondent based on the minimum wage for a period of over three years and ordered that he pay child support arrears for that period of $1,870.68. [read post]
