Search for: "State of Arizona v. Environmental Protection Agency" Results 101 - 120 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm by Bill Marler
 These institutions should use an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered hypochlorite-based disinfectant for environmental surface disinfection after normal cleaning, making sure to follow the label instructions. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
That provision gives the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) discretion to determine how best to integrate tribes into the CAA framework. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
         The High Court points out that absent an agreement among the States, disputes over the allocation of water are subject to equitable apportionment by the courts, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
         The High Court points out that absent an agreement among the States, disputes over the allocation of water are subject to equitable apportionment by the courts, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
         The High Court points out that absent an agreement among the States, disputes over the allocation of water are subject to equitable apportionment by the courts, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:24 pm by Leland E. Beck
EPA “adjacent” is physical, not functional:  The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conclusion that facilities satisfy the regulatory requirement of being “located on . . . adjacent properties” because, although physically independent, they are “truly interrelated. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
" Federal lawyers filed a brief to the court saying the court should leave it to Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency, to sort the issue out. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  Limited oversight:  the role of the federal courts vis-à-vis the Environmental Protection Agency in air pollution control under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am by Kedar
Environmental Protection Agency Kappos v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bodine, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, interning at The White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ);   v  Travis G. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The federal Clean Air Act requires the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“Administrator” or “EPA”) to promulgate modern pollution control limits at the massive Navajo Generating Station (“NGS”) and Four Corners Power Plant (“Four Corners”), located on Navajo tribal lands in Arizona and New Mexico, to remedy unhealthful, scenery-impairing air pollution in protected… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Rather than collaborate to protect the planet against climate change, the United States and China are in a trade war over government support for the very public interest objectives they mutually endorsed. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Rather than collaborate to protect the planet against climate change, the United States and China are in a trade war over government support for the very public interest objectives they mutually endorsed. [read post]