Search for: "State of CT Dept of Children "
Results 101 - 120
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
(Family Ct Act § 832). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm
Ct. 2675 (2013). [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Somerville,.5 AD3d 878 (3d Dept 2004). [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:19 am
Dept. of Children and Families (Fla. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:02 am
Dept. of Children and Families (Fla. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:12 am
Ct. 1995), affd, 239 A.D.2d 106 (1st Dept 1997), affd as mod and remanded, 91 N.Y.2d 723 (1998), it was stated “In New York the term 'joint custody' generally is used to refer only to joint legal custody, or joint decision making. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 9:31 am
Petracca, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 6030894 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.), the parties were married on December 16, 1995. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:51 pm
Ct. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
In Matter of Lamarcus E.,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1211389 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, reversed and reinstated the action ( 80 AD3d 401 [1st Dept 2011] ). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, reversed and reinstated the action ( 80 AD3d 401 [1st Dept 2011] ). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Where Agreement Required Decedent to Name Children as the "Joint Irrevocable Designated Beneficiaries" He Was Without Authority to Name Any Other Person as a Partial or Sole Beneficiary In Johnson v New York State and Local Retirement System, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 895707 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
Valentine, 17 Misc.3d 1117A [Sup Ct Richmond Co 2007] ). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
Emergency Jurisdiction Continues Under UCCJEA for More than Three Years Where Family Court Not Satisfied With Steps to Protect Children Taken by Home State of New Mexico Court In Matter of Bridget Y, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 6848352 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.), a 3-2 decison, the primary issue raised was whether Family Court properly exercised temporary emergency jurisdiction over the children pursuant to Domestic Relations Law 76-c (3). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
The mother appeared pro se by telephone at Family Court's first two hearings, but she withheld her out-of-state address from the father because she alleged that she and the children were fearful of him. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:52 am
Ct. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
As such, Family Court was without jurisdiction to entertain this petition (Family Ct Act 812). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
Two children were born of the marriage. [read post]
