Search for: "State of Cal. v. Super. Ct."
Results 101 - 120
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
Ct. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
In Thomasson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
WD83833 (Ct. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 10:10 am
Super. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 10:10 am
Super. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:49 pm
State Farm, 187 Cal. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
Ct., 235 Cal. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
Super. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 12:38 pm
Ct. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:08 pm
Super. [read post]
29 May 2020, 8:00 am
Ct. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:58 am
Ct. filed March 12, 2020); Rogers v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm
Super. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am
Super. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:54 am
Super. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:19 pm
"The answer, of course, is that I should file a demurrer (in state court) or 12(b)(6) motion (in federal court). [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm
The saga continues in Arizona v. [read post]
