Search for: "State of Delaware v. Sells."
Results 101 - 120
of 754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2022, 10:29 am
In The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
Burtch v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:10 am
When promoting these investments, it is alleged that Citigroup falsified and misrepresented their Mat V fund in regards to its presentation and selling documents. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:55 am
Abramic Leo Pharma A/S v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
And so the Delaware court found it dispositive here. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
We’ve been watching competing interlocutory appeals in a couple of post-Bauman personal jurisdiction cases out of Delaware: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:28 am
The case reveals a story of a jackpot winner, several transactions involving the winnings, and then lawsuits in Nevada and Louisiana state courts, and Delaware federal court. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:34 am
No. 9661-CB [Del Ch Aug. 13, 2015], in which he granted Elting’s petition under § 226 of the Delaware General Corporation Law to appoint a custodian to sell TransPerfect Global even though its business is highly profitable. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:48 pm
Parsons, Jr. of the Delaware Chancery Court in Duff v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:43 am
Schor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:09 am
In Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Currently, a Delaware court will presumably deem the stated intention to sell the shares “when the market is right” credible even if a market does not exist in any practical sense. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
In the recent decision of Mehta v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:42 am
Total Holdings USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
On November 25, 2014, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a decision in In Re Comverge, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
A Delaware PBC board cannot simply sell to the highest bidder. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:32 pm
Dubuque v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:28 am
Relying on Walker Digital LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
Prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Daimler, branded-drug companies often asserted jurisdiction in a state based on general jurisdiction, arguing that the generic company was subject to jurisdiction in the state because it intended to sell the generic version of the drug in the state. [read post]
