Search for: "State of Delaware v. Shorts." Results 101 - 120 of 832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2022, 2:07 pm by Francis Pileggi
In short, when the Delaware Supreme Court speaks, those who labor in its vineyard need to listen. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 10:36 am by Florian Mueller
"), which falls far short of what it takes to "justify the rare and extraordinary relief of a preliminary injunction. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:41 am by Peter Mahler
” Instead, he suggests, courts should follow Delaware’s lead in Zapata Corp. v Maldonado (Del. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Delaware, for example, is the only state that does not require a popular referendum before its constitution can be successfully amended. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:51 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d 799 [3d Dept 2007] [“plaintiffs’ claim for dissolution” of a Delaware LLC “is one over which the New York courts lack subject matter jurisdiction”]; Matter of MHS Venture Mgt. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
  The first part was a short summary that directly addressed the nexus between Ukraine and Regulation S-K. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
For example, under Delaware law and the law of other states, directors may have personal liability for an unlawful share repurchase. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am by Peter Mahler
The court stated that it was “[p]ersuaded . . . by the parties’ experts, both of whom included transaction costs in their valuations under a net asset approach,” and that the lower court “stopped short of making any finding about the deduction that we’ve now determined must be applied. [read post]