Search for: "State of New York et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Millien, et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 10:22 am
The case is New York State Department of Environmental conservation, et al., v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:40 am
The plaintiffs in Hernandez, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
Guttenberg, et al., C.A. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
Marvel Entertainment LLC et. al., Case Number 1:16-cv-02499 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Filed April […] [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 9:40 am
Gulino, et al. (07-0270). [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:19 pm
On August 16, 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered final judgments against James E. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:26 am
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Town of Riverhead, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
& Amazon.com, LLC, et al., holding that New York’s “click-through nexus” statute does not violate the Commerce Clause or the Due Process Clause of the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:14 am
Dept. of Educ., et al, No. 1:18-cv-04459, complaint (E.D.N.Y., Aug. 7, 2018). [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am
Khouli et al. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:03 am
Carter p/k/a Jay-Z, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2006, 12:56 pm
Philip Altholz, et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:53 am
Jenkins, et al v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm
Appealed from the June 27, 2012 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, in State of New York, et al., v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 7:53 am
The parties are submitting briefs and the case - Goldstein et al. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:10 am
NYS Office of Mental Health, et al., No. 6:14-cv-06525, complaint (W.D.N.Y., Sep. 11, 2014). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Calderon-Cardona, et al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Cuomo, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants, New York State's Court of Appeals said that "In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013] *). [read post]
