Search for: "State of New York et al v. United States Department of Justice et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Reilly, Esq., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Reilly, Esq., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:55 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Michele M. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Harvey et al.Amicus brief of Gerald Sherwin et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Evanson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Equally shaky is Marino et al. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Central New York Citizens in Action, Inc., et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDocket: 10-605Issue(s): Whether, under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act, the government must analyze all of the economic impacts of a “critical habitat” designation (regardless of whether the impacts are co-extensive with, or cumulative of, other causes), or instead only those impacts for which “critical habitat” designation is a “but for” cause.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
United States and New Prime v. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 8:32 pm
Department of Justice documented the breakdown of this arrangement in numerous states, in which lawyers acquire hundreds of new clients with whom they may spend only minutes and whom they cannot properly represent. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:46 pm
American Express Co., et al., No. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
New York, et al. (10-1404) and Oneida Indian Nation, et al., v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Not only should the First Amendment apply to the publication by Assange of Manning leaks – after all such publication was not dissimilar from that of the New York Times, the Guardian, et. al. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
