Search for: "State of New York v. Green"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 12:09 am
New York State Board of Elections. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 11:13 am
The number of ill people identified in each state with the outbreak strain is as follows: California (1), Connecticut (1), District of Columbia (1), Georgia (1), Hawaii (1), Iowa (1), Illinois (51), Indiana (9), Massachusetts (1), Missouri (17), New York (1), Pennsylvania (2), South Dakota (1), Tennessee (1), Texas (1), Virginia (1), and Wisconsin (3). [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In or around 2000, Alice Kimble hired Steven Weinstein, a certified public accountant licensed in New York, to prepare her federal and New York state income tax returns. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Matter of Martinez v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 04096 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Matter of Martinez v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 04096 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:20 am
It is likely right, as a matter of New York's common law of misappropriation. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Deceased clients, deceased attorneys, and a disputed real estate transaction lead to Gourary v Green 2017 NY Slip Op 32158(U) October 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651932/10 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In Green Haven Prison Preparative Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:25 am
City of New York [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Since state courts are able to resolve constitutional issues, it is no argument that federal courts are more qualified to do so.In Green, the City of New York took plaintiff's child away on suspicion of child neglect. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
Larkin Subscription Required
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice
Court Denies Consolidation of All Three Dockets, Granting Consolidation of Only Two
People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
LAWRENCE is a Senior Counsel at Epstein Becker & Green in New York. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse has this article concerning the Court's decision yesterday to turn down Rahmani v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a federal district court decision that held that unpaid interns should have been classified and paid as employees under both the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the New York State Labor Law. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:44 am
District Court for New York’s Southern District granted the USGBC’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint, which alleged violations of the Lanham Act and New York law. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
