Search for: "State of South Carolina v. United States et al" Results 101 - 120 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am by SHG
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am by Marie Louise
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Ratification of the ConstitutionPennsylvaniaMassachusettsMarylandNew HampshireVirginiaVirginia Ratification MessageResolution of Virginia’s Proposed AmendmentsNew YorkNorth CarolinaResolution of North Carolina’s Proposed AmendmentsRhode IslandC. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Litigation to block the bill: Hedges et al., v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
As of 1789, most indigenous people within the boundaries of the United States lived in non-State territories claimed by the United States. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Miracle Hill, a foster care placement agency in South Carolina, received a waiver from the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am by Betsy McKenzie
HOWARD SAFIR, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, et al., 99 F. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]