Search for: "State v Kohls" Results 101 - 120 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 3:08 pm by James Hamilton
The Kohl Amendment would mandate a GAO study of the regulatory regime for financial planners as part of the Restoring American Financial Stability Act.Under Kohl’s provision, the GAO will examine current oversight of the financial planning industry at the state and federal level. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 11:51 am by Christine Hurt
Letter from Ken Kohl, dated June 10, 2009 ("When a disaster hits Federal and state governments step in to help those devastated by the disaster offering housing, low interest loans and grants. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm by Harry Styron
It was Kohl Caraway, and he wanted to buy 80 acres that the Ashton  Trust owned in Izard County, Arkansas. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:01 pm by David Snyder
Judge Sonia Sotomayor was asked for her opinion regarding Kelo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
"KOHL: . . .As you know, Judge, the landmark case of Griswold v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Kohl asked if Sotomayor believed that Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am by Clerquette LeClerq
Kohl speeds through Kelo (Takings clause), the general right to privacy, and Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
Supreme Court declined to hear the reverse payment case Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund, Paper, A.F. of L., et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
—————– Violators would forfeit their 180-day exclusivity period: Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)) is amended by inserting `section 29 of the Clayton Act or’ after `that the agreement has violated’. [read post]