Search for: "State v Lane"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
The Supreme Court struck down this law as well, but not until 23 years later in Lane v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:28 am
Champagne corks may have been popping in Chancery Lane last night, but the success of the Law Society in its challenge to the Legal Services Commission’s family tender process is no more than a small victory in a war that cannot be won.As the UK Human Rights Blog states, the decision "may only serve to delay the inevitable ... with the system of legal aid under enormous budgetary pressure". [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
United States (police improperly extended traffic stop to conduct dog sniff of car). [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
Quinn v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
Lane says the rule is not retroactive. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
Centre Lane Partners, LLC v Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 07221 Decided on October 17, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department illustrates two rules. [read post]
27 May 2018, 3:48 pm
A state trooper stopped a vehicle on I-295 in Burlington County. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm
State, 803 So. 2d 856, 860 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).Nicholas v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 8:56 am
The state appealed but in Killenberger v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:32 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Danforth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 2:57 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:50 am
Lane v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:37 pm
The recently decided NJ Supreme Court case of State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
In its unanimous and relatively brief opinion in Lane v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
”) State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
Ceballos, which held that the First Amendment does not protect speech pursuant to the plaintiff's job duties.But Lane v. [read post]