Search for: "State v. A. R." Results 101 - 120 of 78,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2008, 1:44 am
R (BAPIO Action Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2008] UKHL 27; [2008] WLR (D) 133 “Departmental guidance to NHS trusts which had the effect of preventing trainee doctors from overseas being offered postgraduate training places in NHS hospitals was unlawful. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:46 am
R (Barclay and others) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice and others [2009] UKSC 9; [2009] WLR (D) 349 "The presence of two unelected non-voting members in the legislature of the Channel Island of Sark, which had 28 democratically elected voting members, did not contravene art 3 of the First Protocol to [...] [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:54 pm by Staff
R. was accused of embezzling $10,000.00 from her former employer. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:05 am
R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15; WLR (D) 79 “The prohibition in ss 319 and 321 of the Communications Act 2003 on political advertising was compatible with art 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as being necessary in a democratic society. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:39 am
R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2) [2008] UKHL 61; [2008] WLR (D) 322 “Prerogative orders in council which prevented the unrestricted return of Chagos Islanders to their homeland were not unlawful. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The joint session of the Supreme Court and Privy Council heard the appeals in R v Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) between the 27 and 29 October 2015. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The court further held that the trial judge had not been wrong to dismiss the appellant’s submission on non-prosecution assurances and had correctly applied the test in R v Abu Hamza [2007] QB 659. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 11:01 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Comm’r of Social Sec., April 15, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit More Blog Entries: Allensworth v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
In R (Lord Carlile of Berriew CBE QC and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 617 (Admin), the Divisional Court upheld, with evident reluctance, the Home Secretary’s decision to exclude Maryam Rajavi, “an eminent dissident Iranian politician”, from the UK – denying her the opportunity from meeting in the Palace of Westminster with 16 prominent cross-party members of the House of Lords and the House of Commons to discuss… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:38 am by traceydennis
R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Guardian News and Media Ltd and others intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 65; [2010] WLR (D) 31 “As a general principle, the principles of freedom of expression, democratic accountability and the rule of law were integral to the principle of open justice, so that, where litigation had occurred and judgment given, any disapplication of the open justice principle (which included the ordinary right of all… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:46 am
R(AM)(Cameroon) v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (No 2) , Secretary of State for the Home Department as interested party [2008] EWCA Civ 100; [2008] WLR (D) 57 “Where a statutory review of an immigration appeal mistakenly went ahead before a judicial review application establishing a good arguable case had been heard resulting in a final determination, that determination should be set aside and the judicial review proceed. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:16 am by Maanas Jain
The post Case Preview: R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport & Anor appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
At first glance the question facing the Supreme Court in R v Gnango, heard on the 11th and 12th July, reads like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]