Search for: "State v. Andrew Stevens"
Results 101 - 120
of 492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2017, 4:27 am
” Briefly: At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports on the upcoming term’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie “examines the religion question” in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Supreme Court decided Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Scrivani, Stevens & Lee, Elizabeth Ware, Stevens & Lee, pro hac vice & Nicholas H. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:35 am
Muller, Celebrating the Work of Professor Bob Cochran: An Introduction, (47 Pepperdine Law Review iii (2020)).Andrew M. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am
According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 3:53 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Patchak v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
Daphne Keller explained how the Adalah v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
Vincent de Paul School, State Judges, State Judges Are Clowns, Steven Davis, Steven H. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen discusses the case, noting that “just below the surface is a dispute about how far the state may go to punish someone for acting without criminal intent. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
Coverage of Tuesday’s oral arguments in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage comes from David Savage in the Los Angeles Times and Steven Mazie in The Economist (subscription required), while commentary comes from Robert George at Public Discourse, Gene Schaerr at the Daily Signal, Andrew Koppelman and Ilya Somin in an op-ed for USA Today, with a response in a letter to the editor from David Boyle, Steven Mazie at Big Think, Michael… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
(Andrew J. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:29 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
