Search for: "State v. Austin " Results 101 - 120 of 2,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm by John Floyd
District Court Judge Lee Yeakel, who sat in Austin before his May 31, 2023 retirement. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]