Search for: "State v. Batson"
Results 101 - 120
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2008, 12:22 pm
More on Batson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 3:38 pm
Paulino v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:57 am
Here: Articles PDF Lessons from Batson in a Comparative Criminal Context: How Implicit Racial Biases Remain Unaddressed in Canadian Jury SectionBrittney Adams PDF Tribal Treaty Rights and Natural Resource Protection: The Next Chapter United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:27 pm
Aspen v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court reviews racial bias in jury selection in Commonwealth v. Carter
1 Sep 2021, 2:30 am
In the 1986 case of Batson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:03 am
” Batson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 10:38 am
James Batson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 12:57 pm
In Batson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 3:10 pm
The specific issue to be briefed by the parties is did the Mississippi Supreme Court properly apply Batson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:12 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds a New York appellate court in In the Matter of Robar v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
The jury process, the appeal contends, violated the Supreme Court's 1986 ruling in Batson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed again, this time concluding that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:42 am
The rule against discrimination stems from Batson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:54 pm
However, in the case of Batson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:10 am
" Habeas is denied if the state appellate court's deferential review of the trial court is at least reasonable.Briggs v. [read post]
