Search for: "State v. Beers" Results 101 - 120 of 1,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Michael Geist
In fact, the unanimous court made it clear it disagreed with the analysis, stating “there are some significant jurisprudential problems with those aspects of their judgments that warrant comment. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Phil Dixon
The officer noticed empty beer cans in the car and that the defendant was “disheveled and erratic. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am by SHG
Ct. 1683, 1689 n.2 (2020); see also United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
A portion of the law was recently reversed in the court case Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
In re Cordua Rests., 118 USPQ2d at 1638 cited in Royal Crown v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Paul’s Foundation and Shrine of Saint Nicholas the Wonder Worker, Patron of Sailors, Brewers and Repentant Thieves v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am by Neil Wilkof
The Board of Appeal even went on to state the evidence of lower sales might have been sufficient. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This column will develop these two perspectives.Easier to DefendSince the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:07 pm by Jordana Sanft (CA)
Other relief being sought includes an order to require Mill Street to publicly state that it (and its beer) is not associated with the band and to take down its social media posts that make any such association. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:07 pm by Jordana Sanft (CA)
Other relief being sought includes an order to require Mill Street to publicly state that it (and its beer) is not associated with the band and to take down its social media posts that make any such association. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Jake Linford, Florida State University College of Law An Information Theory of Bad Faith Trademark Use Intent is crucial to many P wins, but many scholars criticize this as irrelevant to consumers who can’t see the bad faith adoption. [read post]