Search for: "State v. Blakely"
Results 101 - 120
of 929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
"Said Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in 1992, shortly before Bill Clinton nominated her to the Supreme Court, quoted yesterday, in Aaron Blake's WaPo column, "What Ruth Bader Ginsburg really said about Roe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:40 pm
On remand, we affirm State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
/Poole & Kent v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 6:58 am
After the oral argument in Oregon v. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 4:55 pm
I really want to finish a post I started long ago on Shouse v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
Butler v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
Justice Kagan with opinion in Ross v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:03 am
A recent(ish) case from the Court of Appeals, State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:46 pm
The lawyers at Blake & Dorsten, P.A. have the applications prepared and ready to file for you. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
By an Order dated 16 October 2024 [pdf] Warby LJ granted Laurence Fox permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision in Blake v Fox on 5 of the 7 grounds of appeal relied on. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
See Blakely v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:49 pm
The 11th Circuit took a dive into this interesting issue in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm
As we suggested in our preview of Tuesday’s oral argument in Ross v. [read post]
Randolph does not give a potential defendant veto power over a search where he has to be asked first
7 Jul 2008, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
The state petitioner raised Blakely issues before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:02 am
Blake (not approved for publication)Upon consideration, the motion for partial summary judgment of the defendant ("Schartiger") is GRANTED except as to any claim for compensation due under the terms of the Agent Agreement, and the motion to compel of the plaintiff ("Weaver") is DENIED.This case arose out of the termination of an Agency Agreement (the "Agreement") between Schartiger, owner of an insurance company, and Weaver, a former agent of the company. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
(Recall that I have described Blakely as perhaps the biggest SCOTUS criminal justice decision ever.) [read post]
