Search for: "State v. Briscoe"
Results 101 - 120
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
Watching the ever-cynical Detective Briscoe investigate crimes alongside the good-looking Detective Logan made viewers root for police to catch New York City’s criminals. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:54 pm
Briscoe, 92 Cal. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 4:38 pm
The Appellate Court reasoned as follows: "The Supreme Court has recognized that the common law provides for absolute immunity for judges (see Briscoe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 2:16 pm
Tuggle noted the responses, stating that Ms. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:41 pm
(We exclude Briscoe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm
(Nussbaum, p. 76) The constitutionality of this evasive set of maneuvers went all the way up to the Supreme Court, and in Briscoe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
 Concurring Opinions provides an extensive explanation of both the disparate impact arguments at play in the new firefighter case, Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
In Marsh v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
I confess I was a little sorry to see this part of the opinion; my petition in Briscoe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:30 pm
See Briscoe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:24 am
Briscoe, et al., v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
But, if there is even a possibility that a state court would find that the complaint states a cause of action against any one of the resident defendants, the federal court must find that joinder was proper and remand the case to state court.Slater, 2011 WL 1087240, at *2 (quoting In re Briscoe, 448 F.3d 201, 217 (3d Cir. 2006)) (emphasis original).So what did Slater cite for the proposition that a publisher can be sued for the content of what it publishes? [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 10:36 am
Supreme Court in 2013 with Missouri v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:13 pm
In this case, the underwriting file merely stated that the primary policy had a $10,000 deductible. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
Doll, and Briscoe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
The assignment of error in the 12th District's case of State v. [read post]
