Search for: "State v. Buckman" Results 101 - 120 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2007, 8:58 am
  In so holding, the court distinguished the Supreme Court decision in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and – depending on the allegation – maybe implied preemption under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
That's what was going on in Buckman - preemption would exist because, as in Buckman, the claimed violation would give rise to a novel claim under state law.Second, even where there is a corresponding state-law claim, that claim must actually be "parallel" to the federal claim. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 am by Sean Wajert
Bayer Corp., 2011 WL 5061645 (11th Cir. 2011); Buckman Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:27 am
  In addition to the prior conviction practically screaming "collateral estoppel," we were interested in the Buckman aspects of the original opinion, Johnson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
We've had a chance now to read - no, make that "study" - the Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
The latter ruling was presaged earlier in the term by Philip Morris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am by Bexis
 Once one gets into that sphere, the shadows of the Buckman Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
  There isn’t as much law because Buckman Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:46 pm
Under Buckman, then, she cannot prevail.Id.(2) The defect in question was not discovered until after PMA. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
See Brief For United States As Amicus Curiae, Buckman Co. v. [read post]