Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 101 - 120 of 15,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2020, 8:02 am by IncNow
B” does not refer to a subchapter of the Internal Revenue Code, in the way “S” or “C” do. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:23 am by Steven G. Pearl
S. __, 131 S.Ct. 1740, preempt state law rules invalidating mandatory arbitration provisions in a consumer contract as procedurally and substantively unconscionable? [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 10:52 pm by Fiona de Londras
Related PostsDecember 9, 2009 -- A, B and C v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
Additionally, excluding a defendant's conviction under an out-of-state law that parallels more than one Texas offense listed in section 12.42(c)(2)(B)(i)-(iv), rather than one and one only, is, in her opinion, absurd and contrary to the purpose of the statute. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" (Numbers in Dallas were skewed downward because Class C defendants were mostly incarcerated in unregulated municipal jails for which Appleseed couldn't acquire data.)That's an exceptionally large number, and for only a fraction of the state! [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm by Robert L. Abell
It also appears to run afoul of the analysis in United States v. [read post]