Search for: "State v. Carr"
Results 101 - 120
of 707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2017, 11:37 am
Carr (collectively, Wooster petitioners) and Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. commenced these CPLR article 78 proceedings seeking to annul the negative declaration issued by respondent City of Buffalo Planning Board under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) with respect to the proposed construction of Queen City Landing in Buffalo’s Outer Harbor area. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
I also discuss the case of Carr v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 3:45 pm
Carr. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Coker v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:41 am
v=jfjvLK1QVvg [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:41 am
v=jfjvLK1QVvg [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:31 am
Given that the state has expressly asked the Court to overturn its landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
Federal, and include: United States Code 1925-1988 (includes content up to 1993) From Guide to Law Online: United States Law United States Reports v. 1-542 (1754-2004) From Guide to Law Online: United States Judiciary Code of Federal Regulations (1938-1995) From Guide to Law Online: Executive Federal Register v. 1-58 (1936-1993) From Guide to Law Online: Executive [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:19 am
Carr was not arrested or cited with any offense.The article goes on to state -The practice is perfectly legal. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:55 pm
” Carr, 939 F.2d at 1446; see also United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
Finally, in the peace of a Friday off from work, she has been able to fully digest the decision of Mr Justice Carr in Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology [2016] EWHC 374.What is this case about? [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 2:40 pm
The high court decided long ago in Michigan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:01 am
Carr, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. [**2] SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
" So begins, Carr J's latest trade mark judgment in the English High Court - Pathway IP SARL v Easygroup Ltd [2018] EWHC 3608.This case was a High Court appeal from a successful application by EasyGroup to revoke two trade marks for non-use. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Carr, but Baker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:05 am
The earlier-filed cases are Carr v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
In the alternative, it stated that repudiatory breach was accepted by notice of termination via email on 7 July. [read post]