Search for: "State v. Cornell" Results 101 - 120 of 1,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
An Economic Model of Intermediary Liability          James Grimmelmann, Cornell Law School; Cornell Tech Economic claims about effects of liability regimes are common. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:50 am by Stephen Halbrook
Carney of the Central District of California issued a preliminary injunction in Boland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]