Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 3:01 am
Unfortunately for the rights of the citizens affected by the proposed condemnation, the recent rulings of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Goldstein v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:06 am
The Court also granted review of an issue in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
App. 4th 1353 (Dec. 6, 2013), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Eight) offered us our first look at how a California Court of Appeal views the relevance of Dukes in a state class action, outside the Title VII context.The background of the case generated some additional interesting points, so it's worth a quick summary. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm
Satz, which I blogged on last week, the court stated that “[n]o such risk exists in state courts, as it is a fundamental principle that civil courts may not become entangled in religious proceedings “if resolution requires the interpretation of religious doctrine. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 1:42 pm
Maphet’s case was recently presented to the Court of Appeals, Division II, and the court opinion was just published. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Ralphs Grocery Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jul. 12, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) addressed the impact of the Concepcion case. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
Appeals in most States are wholly governed by an intricate web of statutes, and appellate court interpretations of statutes. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:16 pm
Ruling in the affirmative, the appeals court provides a salient summary of New Jersey law on successor liability in the context of corporate law. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The defendants subsequently filed with the Appellate Division a motion to reargue or, alternatively, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 6:53 pm
The Court of Appeals considered its first case under G.S. 15A-1347(b) last year in State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am
Under State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:13 pm
On December 29, 2009, the Court of Appeals published a unanimous opinion in City of Rockford v. 63rd District Court, No. 287501, affirming the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of Defendants. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
As the instant petition illustrates, the resultant unresolved divisions among the Courts of Appeals can have direct and severe consequences for defendants’ sentences. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:20 pm
Supreme Court's statement in State Farm v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
On June 7, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Tinder, Inc., ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Jan. 29, 2018), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) held that because the complaint adequately alleged a violation of the Unruh Act (namely, age-based price discrimination), the complaint also stated a claim for violation of the UCL's "unlawful" prong. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:23 pm
App. 1999), the Court of Appeals stated:There, the division stated that, to apply the statute of limitations in a CDARA case, “a claim accrues when a physical manifestation of a defect appears, even though its cause is not known at that time. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Last October, the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco held that for the sixty days to start running after the court clerk "mails" a document, the court clerk must "mail" it using the United States Postal Service. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:24 pm
So I was extremely interested to see a similar ruling out of the New York State Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
