Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2008, 6:06 pm
In a decision that is certain to cause a few ripples in city and county planning departments, Division I of the Court of Appeals held that a King County Ordinance which limits clearing on property zoned rural area residential to a maximum of 50 percent, depending on the size of the parcel, violates RCW 82.02.020. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:01 am
Unfortunately for the rights of the citizens affected by the proposed condemnation, the recent rulings of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Goldstein v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am
The Court of Appeals agreed with the Appellate Division decision below that PL265.03(3) creates an exception to the home or business exception. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:06 am
The Court also granted review of an issue in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
App. 4th 1353 (Dec. 6, 2013), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Eight) offered us our first look at how a California Court of Appeal views the relevance of Dukes in a state class action, outside the Title VII context.The background of the case generated some additional interesting points, so it's worth a quick summary. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm
Satz, which I blogged on last week, the court stated that “[n]o such risk exists in state courts, as it is a fundamental principle that civil courts may not become entangled in religious proceedings “if resolution requires the interpretation of religious doctrine. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 1:42 pm
Maphet’s case was recently presented to the Court of Appeals, Division II, and the court opinion was just published. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Ralphs Grocery Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jul. 12, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) addressed the impact of the Concepcion case. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
Appeals in most States are wholly governed by an intricate web of statutes, and appellate court interpretations of statutes. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:16 pm
Ruling in the affirmative, the appeals court provides a salient summary of New Jersey law on successor liability in the context of corporate law. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 6:53 pm
The Court of Appeals considered its first case under G.S. 15A-1347(b) last year in State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am
Under State v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The defendants subsequently filed with the Appellate Division a motion to reargue or, alternatively, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:13 pm
On December 29, 2009, the Court of Appeals published a unanimous opinion in City of Rockford v. 63rd District Court, No. 287501, affirming the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of Defendants. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
As the instant petition illustrates, the resultant unresolved divisions among the Courts of Appeals can have direct and severe consequences for defendants’ sentences. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:20 pm
Supreme Court's statement in State Farm v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
On June 7, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am
Sweden, paragraph 37); but also (i) procedural economy, court capacities (Fejde v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Tinder, Inc., ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Jan. 29, 2018), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) held that because the complaint adequately alleged a violation of the Unruh Act (namely, age-based price discrimination), the complaint also stated a claim for violation of the UCL's "unlawful" prong. [read post]
