Search for: "State v. Curtis" Results 101 - 120 of 812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bank of the United States (1824) and Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833). [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:36 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Prior bad act Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, Curtis Lee Wootten, appellant, was convicted of first-degree assault, two counts of second-degree assault, and two counts of reckless endangerment, stemming from two separate altercations with his wife, Milissa David. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
White House press secretary Jen Psaki affirmed President Biden’s commitment to codifying Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:10 pm by Victoria Gallegos
  Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring audio from a virtual event on espionage fiction, hosted by the Michael V. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
Article V obligates U.S. support in an armed attack against “territories under the administration of Japan. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm by Howard Bashman
“Court ruling means hundreds of state criminal cases will be shifted to tribal or federal courts”: Samantha Vicent and Curtis Killman of The Tulsa World have this report. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d 282, 291, 293). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Curtis v Phillips (Civil Dispute) [2020] ACAT 115- a case concerning a Facebook post which made alleged defamatory comments against the claimant and how they conducted their cake making business. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]