Search for: "State v. D. S."
Results 101 - 120
of 43,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is D&D Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:52 pm
The post State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
This post concludes and summarizes our coverage of the case United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:29 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (2) [2008] EWHC 2100 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 300 “In performing the necessary balancing exercise in relation to public interest immunity and the exercise of the court's discretion to order disclosure, it was incumbent on the court to have regard to the absence of a relevant consideration in the PII certificate and schedule, namely, in the light of the allegations made by… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:41 am
Regina (SG ( Iraq)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Regina (OR ( Iraq)) Same: [2012] EWCA Civ 940; [2012] WLR (D) 207 “A claimant affected by, but not party to, a country guidance determination which was under appeal to the Court of Appeal was not entitled to an automatic stay of removal pending the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
That’s the question the prosecutor asked a witness in State v Gibbs. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:03 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 287 “The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government was not entitled to use the discretionary power to revoke regional strategies contained in s 79(6) of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 to effect the practical abrogation of the regional strategies as a complete tier of planning… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:01 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 39 “A stated intention by the Government to abolish regional strategies and to promote legislation for that purpose was capable in law of constituting, for the purposes of section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a ‘material consideration’ to which planning authorities could have taken regard in making… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:41 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (3) [2008] EWHC 2519 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 323 “In the light of the stance taken by the US government that it would reconsider the intelligence relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom if the court were to make the order sought by the claimant, the appropriate course was to stay proceedings until after the outcome of the forthcoming hearing in the US… [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:34 am
§ 974.05(1)(d)3. (2007-08). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 am
R (Mirza and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 159; [2011] WLR (D) 55 “The Home Secretary, when refusing to extend a foreign national’s leave to remain in the United Kingdom, ought at the same time or promptly thereafter make a removal decision which, if adverse, would enable the foreign national to appeal without breaking the law by overstaying. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
In Ortiz v United States, 585 U. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:37 am
Batista v Secretary of State of the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 896; [2010] WLR (D) 233 “When considering whether a decision to deport a national of the European Economic Area (‘EEA’) was proportionate, the court should ask itself whether members of the deportee’s family would move to the country of origin with the deportee and whether it was reasonable to expect them to do so, rather than to ask whether there were ‘insurmountable… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 8:49 pm
The post State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
The Court’s ruling, in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Kendrick v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:22 am
Regina (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Secretary of State for the Home Department and another intervening) [2009] UKSC 3; [2009] WLR (D) 310 “Information about a person's convictions which was systematically collected and stored in central records and was available for many years after the convictions had receded into the past could fall within [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am
R (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1; [2010] WLR (D) 4 “Where an individual was subject to two or more sets of proceedings, or phases of a single proceeding, and a civil right or obligation enjoyed or owed by him would be determined in one of them, he could (but not necessarily would), by force of art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, enjoy… [read post]
