Search for: "State v. Daniel W. E." Results 101 - 120 of 414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
Sperber, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Denver Challenging the Take - Dana Berliner, Director, Institute for Justice, Arlington, Virginia, Janet Bush Handy, Deputy Counsel, Assistant Attorney General, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore and Matthew W. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Reports of State Trials New Series. 8 v. (1888-1898) Macdonell, John; Wallis, John E. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
[W]e also weigh evidence of the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline Rules and Regulations Governing Procedures on Complaints and Hearings  (“Rules and Regulations”)] 10(B).Lake County Bar Association v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider “[w]hether § 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides federal jurisdiction over state-law claims seeking to establish liability based on violations of the Act or its regulations or seeking to enforce duties created by the Act or its regulations. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:50 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Arbitrariness Review Made Reasonable: Structural and Conceptual Reform of the “Hard Look” is cited in the following article: Daniel E. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 11:17 am by Daniel Cappetta
The Court specifically stated that “[W]e emphasize that, while we discern no abuse of discretion in this case, it is because of the unusual context in which the challenged sentence was made…. [read post]