Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 101 - 120 of 4,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Keyssar patiently reviews the numerous occasions when proposals for district elections or the proportional division of a state’s electors dominated the reform agenda, and examines the arguments made on both sides, along with the other permutations and combinations of electoral reforms they generated. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm by David Super
  Instead, it is very much an extension of the single-minded, bare-knuckles, brand of interest-group politics that has dominated in recent years. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:30 am by Christopher W. Schmidt
Wade has been a dominant presence in debates about the Constitution and the Supreme Court in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
In turn, Max Mosley v News Group Newspapers, is a prime example of a claimant not having advanced knowledge prior to publication and therefore being unable to prevent publication.The basis of Max Mosley v UK is best summarised by Dominic Crossley (Steeles Law LLP) stating:“…although we all have a right to privacy, it is entirely up to the editor of a newspaper whether or not we are able to exercise that right in any effective or meaningful way. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Legal news was dominated by coverage of U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:05 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(“IGRA”) does not authorize an allocation of jurisdiction from tribal court to state court over a personal injury claim arising from the allegedly negligent serving of alcohol on Indian land, and further that the New Mexico State District Court does not have jurisdiction in the case of Gina Mendoza, Michael Hart and Dominic Montoya v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
As you might expect, there has been a lot of press coverage of yesterday's argument in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am by Matthew Lanahan
United States, scheduled for consideration at today’s Conference. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am by David Oscar Markus
But the case brings the most direct legal challenge in the United States to the clout that Apple has built up through its App Store. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:20 am by emagraken
 It is an error of law not to take into account the fact a party was the dominant driver (Bedwell v. [read post]