Search for: "State v. Dragon"
Results 101 - 120
of 408
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:56 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:20 am
But nine days after her husband left for an out-of-state deployment, the child was dead from dehydration. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
The Seventh Circuit is among the most willing of the circuits to shift fees, stating in Riviera Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:30 am
The court in Goldin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:43 am
Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 2:21 am
A few other tips from a presentation designed to make lawyers more comfortable with social media and the review process: State bars can only regulate commercial speech. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:01 pm
When I teach Cyberlaw, I include Porter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
The New Republic also has a review of Norman Davies, Vanished Kingdoms: The Rise and Fall of States and Nations (Viking), which Jacob Soll describes as a "colossal wreck of a book. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:56 pm
• The new Regulation 5(9) is related to direct v. indirect acquisitions and mergers/amalgamations. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:22 am
In a recent ruling on February 9, 2012, the Texas Court of Appeals awarded a lodestar enhancement in Stratton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:14 am
Image via WikipediaIn a 12-page decision, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit last week ruled an ex-Wall Street Journal reporter was protected by New York's shield law from having to testify in a former client's civil suit against Goldman Sachs.In Baker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
: the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Louis Vuitton has a zero-tolerance policy against counterfeiters, (which IP Dragon thinks, deserves emulation). [read post]
