Search for: "State v. Eady" Results 101 - 120 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2018, 10:05 am by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor (2018) EWCA Civ 548 The was the SoS appeal to the Court of Appeal of an Upper Tribunal decision (our note here). [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:28 pm
The decision in Tamiz v Google provides some guidelines as to the temporal conditions which might give rise to liability of intermediaries for third parties' wrongdoings. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Then the Government joined in, instructing James Eadie QC to intervene in support of the appeal. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
A claimant will ordinarily be unable to obtain an interim injunction to restrain an apprehended alleged defamatory publication where a defendant states an intention to raise an affirmative defence. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
(vi)  The possibility of the rule in Bonnard v Perryman being revisited and revised has been raised by Eady J extrajudicially on two occasions. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The surveillance aspects to these orders follow the precedent set in Howlett v Holding [2006] EWHC 41 (QB) where Eady J stated: Holding has revealed that he has had Mrs Howlett watched at various times and wishes to retain his right to do so, whatever anxiety and distress that may cause her [16]. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
[Update]   There was a hearing in the case of Kaschke v Osler on 23 April before Eady J. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm by INFORRM
“Watson quoted [Mr Justice] Eady saying, ‘The lack of action displays a remarkable state of affairs at News International“. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 15 December 2017 judgment was handed down on behalf of Sir David Eady in the case of Pannu v Carter. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:53 am
In the UK High Court, Mr Justice Eady concluded that the articles and images constituted a breach of Mr Mosley’s right to privacy: Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008). [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm by Adam Wagner
The most notorious example has been McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 9 December 2010, Mr Justice Eady handed down judgment in Lait v Evening Standard (No.2) ([2010] EWHC 3239 (QB)). [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 17 October 2016, there was an assessment of damages in the case of Undre & anr v The London Borough of Harrow, before Sir David Eady. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of Eze Europe Ltd v Garcia. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
Eady J was clear that the injunction still served a purpose in protecting the claimant and his family stating “The principle, however, is clear. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:44 am by INFORRM
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland ([2019] EWCA Civ 648 [£])(judgment not presently available on Bailii)(heard 25 to 26 July 2018): The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a decision of Sir David Eady ([2018] EWHC 3368 (QB)). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:16 am by INFORRM
The interests of our readers are reflected in the top ten posts of the past three months which are as follows: The MP and the “Super-Injunction” – rumour, myth and distortion (again) Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Opinion: “CTB and Imogen Thomas, Eady versus the Tabloid Press? [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:31 am by INFORRM
These delays have taken place in many of the recent privacy and confidence actions, for example, Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers, Napier v Pressdram, and Cream Holdings v Banerjee. [read post]