Search for: "State v. Eager "
Results 101 - 120
of 1,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Pritchard and Thompson argue that the Court permitted the SEC to fill in statutory gaps to attack insider trading and overtake areas of state authority, even extending implied federal rights of action to shareholders in the case of Superintendent of Ins. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
By Mark S. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
Here again a sort of stability: Cuba's debt crisis is itself a positive element of stability in the sense that neither Cuba nor its lenders appear eager to move away from the stability of the current practice of lending Cuba to a precipice and then renegotiating. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
They also state that they expect the app’s users to follow the guidelines to receive the best possible results. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 10:04 am
For instance, in the Virginia case of Washington v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:25 am
DorfIn Bostock v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
The reversal of Roe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 5:35 pm
As the United States Supreme Court explained long ago in Hudson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm
For their project, "Anti-CRT Bills Come to Campus: New Threats to Free Expression & Academic Freedom from State Legislatures,” Amna Khalid and Jeffrey Snyder, Carlton College, “are eager to interview faculty, historians in particular, who have been affected by these laws. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:33 pm
Kalal v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
But to the stated end? [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Bruen and West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol… [read post]
