Search for: "State v. Edward Peoples"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 5:26 am
Alexei V. [read post]
17 May 2014, 12:00 am
Glenn Greenwald’s new book on Edward Snowden, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Evidence was given at the trial that the VPR would have been circulated to not more than 150 people. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
As a result of Ramos, the two states that had been permitting and using non-unanimous jury rules for criminal trials—Louisiana and Oregon—were required to retry (or let free) the several hundred convicted persons in those states whose juries were not unanimous and whose cases were still on direct appeal.Last month, in Edwards v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Steele (1979) 25 Cal.3d 406, 410 (Edwards); see People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Mary Ziegler (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2023). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Regents of the Univ. of Calif. , Jan. 13, 2016, California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District More Blog Entries: Edwards v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Regents of the Univ. of Calif. , Jan. 13, 2016, California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District More Blog Entries: Edwards v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Regents of the Univ. of Calif. , Jan. 13, 2016, California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District More Blog Entries: Edwards v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in ACLU v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
Comer v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
Facebook isn’t a state actor. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
Jeannie Suk, Harvard Law School, has published "'The Look in His Eyes': The Story of State v. [read post]
