Search for: "State v. Elliot" Results 101 - 120 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 5:53 am
I have a special holiday throwback Case of the Week for you: Kreilkamp v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
§ 1981 (2000), and Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act (the "Elliot-Larsen Act"), Mich. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
§ 1981 (2000), and Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act (the "Elliot-Larsen Act"), Mich. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:45 am by Elliot Setzer
Elliot Setzer shared a Justice Department memo announcing they will monitor state and local pandemic policies for civil rights violations. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Moreover, where "evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court must determine whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one" (Steve Elliot, LLC v Teplitsky, 59 AD3d 523, 524, citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275). [read post]