Search for: "State v. Elliot"
Results 101 - 120
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 12:19 pm
As far back as the 1982 (in a ruling on the case of Licari v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm
At first blush, Lucia v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:53 am
I have a special holiday throwback Case of the Week for you: Kreilkamp v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
§ 1981 (2000), and Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act (the "Elliot-Larsen Act"), Mich. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
§ 1981 (2000), and Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act (the "Elliot-Larsen Act"), Mich. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:04 am
Elliot v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:45 am
Elliot Setzer shared a Justice Department memo announcing they will monitor state and local pandemic policies for civil rights violations. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
Houdek v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 8:19 am
Kershaw v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 8:19 am
Kershaw v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:42 pm
See State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:32 pm
Rishty v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
December 3, 2012), and Pickup v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Moreover, where "evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court must determine whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one" (Steve Elliot, LLC v Teplitsky, 59 AD3d 523, 524, citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275). [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
In Mullane v. [read post]
