Search for: "State v. Events Intern., Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 1,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
On Wednesday 10th May the Court will hand-down judgment in Jalla and another v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company and another [2023] UKSC 16. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
The fracas surrounding ROSS Intelligence was a relatively recent event and a not unfamiliar reminder of and lesson on the difficulties of challenging behemoths, and winning or losing; many have come and gone. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
In his application for a residence permit, he had said that he had been a missionary of Baptist International Missions, Inc. and had come to Russia to carry out missionary work, and witnesses had confirmed that they had been attending the Bible readings at his home for two to five years. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Such quarterly disclosures state whether the issuer’s relevant officers or directors have traded in securities subject to the issuer’s buyback program within 10 business days before or after its announcement.[8] Shortcomings of the SEC’s Reforms The key shortcoming of the SEC reforms are the absence of prospective disclosure requirements with respect to the adoption of Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements and other trading arrangements despite its stated purpose of… [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
S. ___, ___–___ (2018) (GORSUCH, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 4–5); Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:43 pm
(Rent–A–Center, [West, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:56 pm
On March 21, 2022, hackers posted screenshots on their Telegram channel showing what they claimed was Okta’s “internal company environment. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
” The report suggests these concerns may derive from three different qualities of sustainable business information and reporting: control v. influence; quantitative v. qualitative; and historical v. forward-looking. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
” Bullard v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Glock, Inc. (9th Cir. 2009)). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
Yesterday, federal District Judge Reed O'Connor issued a decision in Braidwood Management, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am
PRC Race Suit According to EEOC’s complaint in EEOC v PRC Industries, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:55 am
It’s not unusual in business divorce litigation for events on the ground to outpace events in the courtroom. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
On Wednesday 29thand Thursday 30th March the Court will hear the case of Jalla and another v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company and another, on appeal from [2021] EWCA 63. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In any event, respondent was entitled to submit the affidavit on its cross motion, and the court properly considered it in evaluating the merits of petitioner's claim (see Basis Yield Alpha Fund [Master] v Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 115 AD3d 128, 134-135 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275 [1977]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In any event, respondent was entitled to submit the affidavit on its cross motion, and the court properly considered it in evaluating the merits of petitioner's claim (see Basis Yield Alpha Fund [Master] v Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 115 AD3d 128, 134-135 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275 [1977]). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
