Search for: "State v. Evergreen District Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
The court was much influenced by the declarations from ten competitors in the market, that stated that they used similar exclusive dealing contracts with “evergreen” renewal provisions, as used by the defendants. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:16 am
So far, the courts have bought their arguments (the decision on the NYC law, Evergreen Assoc. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
Thankfully, common sense prevailed — at least on the breach of warranty claim — and on Friday the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denied the motion to dismiss on the basis of pre-emption, holding: [T]he Limited Warranty does not implicate the FDA’s determination of either safety or effectiveness. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm
The Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Eight, held in a published decision, Western States Petroleum Assn. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
” More importantly, citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:03 pm
City of Lake Forest v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
(IP Osgoode) Patent Pilot Program (Docket Report) Design Patents (Inventive Step) US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Marine Polymer and Section 112 rejections in reexamination: Nissim v Time Warner (WHDA) ITC issues notice of final determination finding s 337 violation in Certain Ink Cartridges With Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC 337 Law Blog) District Court Arizona: Judge Campbell denies prosecution bar in reexamination: NeXedge v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:08 am
Complaint, United States v City of Joliet (filed Aug 4 2011) // [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:08 am
Complaint, United States v City of Joliet (filed Aug 4 2011) // <! [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:25 pm
He ran for the 248th District Court bench in 2010 as a Democrat. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am
Again relying on the state constitution, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled (in York v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
On January 13, the Evergreen Freedom Foundation presented oral argument before the Washington Supreme Court as amicus curiae ("Friend of the Court") in the case of Cary v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:45 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Prejudgment Interest on Quantum Meruit Claim Is Held Mandatory Under State Law Stillman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Reversing the district court, the Third Circuit admonished:Federal courts may not engage in judicial activism. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:10 pm
Patent and Trademark Office et. al, (Prior Art) US: District Court New Jersey: Drug label may provide evidence of intent to induce infringement even though required by the FDA: Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:09 am
Evergreen Dynasty Corp. when I talk about problems with the ADA, and regularly cite Molski v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:38 am
DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction Over German Firm Accused of Patent Infringement The Research Foundation of the State University of New York v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
District Court in Roanoke. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
According to a complaint filed simultaneously with the settlement in federal court in the District of Columbia, between 1998 and 2006, Cummins shipped more than 570,000 heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers nationwide without pollution control equipment included, in violation of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
