Search for: "State v. Feather"
Results 101 - 120
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
This modern “rational basis” review originated in the 1955 case of Williamson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Small Business Capital Corp., Mark Feathers; Investors Prime Fund, LLC; and SBC Portfolio Fund, LLC.Case number: 12-cv-3237 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: June 21, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 6, 2013 11/21/2013 02/19/2014 2013-105 SEC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:03 am
You probably saw this coming, but it’s worth stating. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
LEXIS 167347, Nov. 4, 2013), and held that a suit in which an inmate alleged he had been improperly removed from a faith-based dormitory and retaliated against for grieving the incident was properly removed from state to federal court, despite plaintiff's state law allegations.In Petty v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
In Morrical v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Alt v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
He sought their return, their exclusion as evidence in his upcoming state criminal trial, dismissal of criminal charges against him and millions of dollars in damages.In Doe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:33 am
Here are the materials in Hall v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 4:40 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:45 am
The Competition Tribunal has now issued its decision, which now sheds light on the reasoning for its dismissal of the Bureau’s abuse case against Canada’s largest real estate board (see: The Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
Navajo Nation v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
And the bad news (liability): For the reasons stated, the Court concludes the following: As to defendant Phillips, the City is directed to clarify whether it is still seeking monetary relief against him, and if so, to submit further damages briefing that identifies the amounts the City is seeking against Phillips only. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:01 am
The case, Purdue, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
I wanted to write a book about eagle feathers. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:37 am
State, 86 So.3d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 7:14 am
Compare Feather v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
United States v. [read post]
